Using the Ghanaian journal Research
Review as an example for demonstrating access to African research
and scholarship
Lorna Peterson
Abstract: Reports the results of bibliographic searching,
indexing and citation analysis of the Ghanian journal Research
Review for defined elements of barriers to access. Barriers to the
dissemination of information are defined as: lack of indexing, lack of
abstracting, lack of abstracting in a culturally relevant way, lack of
a culturally relevant thesaurus, lack of holdings/purchasing by
European and North American libraries, lack of citing indigenous
African authors publishing in indigenous journals, and lack of
preservation of originals for long term access. Results from searching
WorldCat and RLIN indicate that Research Review is held by 48
libraries in North America and Europe. Research Review is
indexed and abstracted, but not consistently and not in sources that
are easily accessible, suggesting that barriers do exist regarding its
dissemination that similar European or American journals do not face.
Comments are made on citation analysis of selected writers as authors
and cited authors. The physical condition of the journal and the
efforts to digitize its contents are addressed. Recommendations for
increasing the visibility and accessibility of the journal are made.
Acknowledgments
An ALISE/OCLC research award supported this
research. The author also acknowledges the assistance of the following
individuals in the completion of this research: Jean Dickson, librarian
in the University at Buffalo, University Libraries system, Lockwood
Library, Mwalimu Shujaa and Georgina Johnston both of Fort Valley State
University, Fort Valley, Georgia, and Stephanie H. Wical, Department of
Library and Information Studies graduate assistant at the University at
Buffalo, SUNY.
Background
and Introduction
Scholars in developing and developed nations often
decry the lack of access to developing nations' research and especially
that of Africa (Gibbs 1995; Yankah 1995; Agada 2000; Cobb 2001).
Although there are detractors (Stankus 1996) and apologists (Zell 2003)
regarding the significance of the problem, there is little that
operationalizes and measures what specifically these barriers are and
their magnitude. A research grant from OCLC, Inc., allowed for the
exploration of indexing, abstracting, abstracting in a culturally
relevant way, identifying a culturally relevant thesaurus, citation
analysis and library holdings of the journal Research Review,
a social sciences and humanities journal published by the University of
Ghana, Legon since 1965 and as "New Series" v. 1, no. 1 from 1985. The
report was published by OCLC and placed on its web site as a PDF file
under the title: "Operationalizing Barriers to Dissemination of African
Research and Scholarship: Case Study," Research Review (Ghana)
spring 2003.
For the purposes of this study, "culturally
relevant subject headings" means that the vocabulary control reflects
the culture, values, customs, aesthetics, and beliefs of the group
under study. In the example of Africa, subject headings would not be
Euro-centric but rather Afro-centric. Culturally relevant subject
headings come from within the culture and not from outside. An example
of non-culturally relevant subject headings from Research Review
is how in the North American index Modern Languages Association
International Bibliography, articles are indexed under "Africa"
and not more specific, meaningful headings that would target an article
as being about a type of dance, folklore, etc.
Print
culture in Ghana
Anaba Alemna (2002) writes that books were
introduced into Ghana early in its history through Islam and then much
later by Christian missionaries, providing a foundation for a
publishing industry. In the 1950s, print culture was assisted by the
Public Library Act of 1950, and the fee-free educational system
promulgated in 1957 after Ghana's independence. 1996 saw the inaugural
bi-annual Ghana International Book Fair (Maissen 1997).
Regarding book and serial statistics, the 2004 International
Literacy Market Place lists over 30 publishers in Ghana, five book
dealers and nothing for book manufacturing. Publishers in Ghana are
primarily state publishers who produce textbooks (Alemna 2002). For
book and serial production statistics, the United Nations Statistical
Office cites 28 books published in Ghana for 1992 (Demographic Year
Book. United Nations 1997, 111-116) found at: www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/education/book_production/africa.html.
A subject search for "Ghana" in Ulrich's
International Periodicals Directory results in eighteen periodical
titles; a search in the same database for "Ghana" under
"Publisher/Distributor" results in 102 serial titles. Although not
robust, these statistics do indicate a print and publishing culture in
Ghana that is certainly not bleak.
Education indicators for Ghana from the United
Nations Statistics Division show Ghanaians reach on average 7.3 years
of schooling (2000/2001). The estimated figures for adult (15 years +)
illiteracy are 19.7% for males and 36.8% for females (United Nations,
2000). There are three major universities in Ghana: University of Cape
Coast, University of Ghana, and University of Science and Technology.
These figures indicate a foundation for authorship, scholarship, and
local consumption of Ghanaian literature creation. The University of
Ghana, Legon, journal Research Review is an example of this
foundation for success.
About the journal Research Review
The inaugural issue was published in 1965, and in
1985 the journal restarted as Research Review, New Series v. 1,
no. 1. It is a publication by the Institute of African Studies,
established in 1963 at the University of Ghana, Legon. From its 30th
anniversary proclamation we learn that, "In addition to publishing the
results of its research in a form in which it will be available to
scholars, the Institute must be concerned with its diffusion ..." (p.
18, University of Ghana, 30th Anniversary Celebration. African
Studies: The Vision and the Reality. Kwame Arhin, Director of
the
Institute, March 1992). It is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary
scholarly journal of the humanities and social sciences in Africa,
appearing twice a year. The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
is ISSN 0855 4412. This number was not assigned until 1993 when the
Institute applied for and received its ISSN (phone conversation with
general editor Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, December 12, 2002). Because it
did not have an ISSN until 1993, subscription, purchasing and publisher
information for the journal does not appear in Ulrich's
International Periodicals Directory for 38 years of its existence.
"Greater dissemination of the
rich content in Research Review would be improved if a variety of
indexing and abstracting commercial services would include the journal
in their universe of international journals indexed and/or abstracted."
Barriers
to the dissemination of Research Review
From conducting a review of the literature on
indexing and access to journal literature, barriers to access are
defined as:
- lack of indexing
- lack of abstracting
- lack of abstracting in a culturally relevant way
- lack of a culturally relevant thesaurus
- lack of holdings/purchasing by European and
North American libraries
- lack of citing indigenous African authors
publishing in indigenous journals
- lack of preservation of originals for long term
access
The results of bibliographic searching, indexing
and citation analysis show the following:
Content Overview of Research
Review 1965-2002*
Articles |
298 |
Book reviews |
12 |
Research/Project reports and research notes |
152 |
Library and museum reports |
13 |
Institute news and publications |
39 |
Miscellaneous unsigned |
60 |
*(Johnson, 2002)
Library Holdings
A search of WorldCat, OCLC's bibliographic catalog
containing over 50 million records of books, serials, media, and other
materials held by 20,000 libraries worldwide, and RLIN, a bibliographic
utility containing over 42 million bibliographic records, revealed the
following:
Bibliographic Utility |
Number of libraries holding item |
OCLC |
44 |
RLIN |
14 |
Unique RLIN holdings |
4 |
Although both OCLC and RLIN are international
bibliographic catalogs, it cannot be said that the coverage is
complete. For example, during a December 12, 2002 audio-conference with
the Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana-Legon and the
African World Studies Institute, Fort Valley State University, general
editor of the Research Review, Mary Esther Kropp Dabuku
expressed surprise at the number of North American and European
libraries with holdings. She also added that several German libraries
subscribe that are not counted in the 48 unique libraries mentioned in
the above chart. This serves as a caution to remember that American
bibliographic utilities are not wholly representative of world library
holdings, and that universal bibliographic control cannot be determined
by using these databases. Identifying world wide library holdings for
this journal remains elusive, but compare the holdings in OCLC/WorldCat
for the United Kingdom serial publications Africa (1928- ),
with 509 libraries showing they own that item, and Journal of
African History (1960- ), with 958 libraries showing ownership,
and the limited availability of Research Review becomes
apparent.
Indexing
How has bibliographic control for the contents of Research
Review been established? The journal provided access
through:"Index to the Research Review (Old Series) v.1.
(1965) - V.12 (1980)," which appears in V. 2, No. 1, (New Series)
January 1986, pages 83 through 103, complied by Fred Bannerman-Williams
of the Institute Library. This index is an alphabetical listing of
authors and their article citation; there is no subject access. There
is also no indication that the index will be updated and produced
regularly.
Cataloging records produced under Anglo-American
cataloging rules indicate that Research Review is indexed
by the Modern Languages Association, MLA International Bibliography.
A journal title search in this database results in 36 citations dated
from 1967 to 1973 and one citation for 1988. Since Research Review
is a social science and humanities journal, it is not expected that
every article would be indexed by MLA International Bibliography
but literature, drama and theater articles were published in Research
Review post 1988 and are not indexed in this database. A search of
the new title, Research Review. New Series results in only
one 1988 article, a duplicate citation of the search that yields 36
citations. Searching under New Series results in zero
citations.
Social Sciences Citation Index, produced
by ISI (Institute of Scientific Information) provides access to current
and retrospective bibliographic information, author abstracts, and
cited references from more than 1,700 of the world's leading scholarly
social sciences journals covering more than 50 disciplines. Research
Review is not one of the indexed journals. Arts &
Humanities Citation Index, also produced by ISI, is an
interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary index covering the journal
literature from the arts and humanities. It indexes 1,144 of the
world's leading arts and humanities journals, and also covers selected,
relevant items from over 6,800 major science and social science
journals. Again, Research Review is not one of the indexed
journals. Other databases checked where it was found that Research
Review was not indexed are: The International Index to Black
Periodicals Full Text, and JSTOR (Journal Storage:
The Scholarly Journal Archive). In JSTOR's email survey
conducted April 2002, librarians were polled at participating
institutions worldwide, asking them to describe what disciplines, both
new and existing, they would like to see developed in JSTOR.
Over 850 librarians responded and Africa and the inclusion of African
journals was not noted as an important issue (see "About Us" page www.jstor.org/about/future-collections.html,
active as of October 31, 2002). JSTOR does have participating
institutions from the African nations and regions Ivory Coast, Namibia,
South Africa, and Zambia. An interesting follow up survey might be to
query librarians specifically on the availability and inclusion of
African journals.
African Abstracts/ Bulletin Analytique
Africaniste published by the International African Institute in
London, England, does provided some indexing to Research Review;
for example, its volumes for the years 1966, 1968, 1970 and 1972 are
abstracted but there is limited subject access. These abstracts are
arranged by region and appear in African Abstracts under the
subject heading "West Africa– Ghana." A user would have to know that Research
Review is a Ghanian journal in order to retrieve information.
Universal subject searching on specific topics is not possible with African
Abstracts. The indexes African Studies (NISC–
National Information Services Corporation) and Quarterly Index to
Periodical Literature, are bibliographic sources for African
literature and were not checked during this stage of the research
project.
Title |
Coverage |
Dates/citations |
Index to Research Review |
1965-1980 |
1965-1980, published in 1986 |
Modern Language Association
International Bibliography |
1967–1973; 1988 |
36 citations |
Arts and Humanities Citation Index |
none |
If cited by author, Research Review
shows up in cited bibliography. Cited references: 35 |
Social Sciences Citation Index |
none |
If cited by author, Research Review
shows up in cited bibliography. Cited references: 80 |
International Index to Black
Periodicals Full Text |
none |
|
JSTOR (The Scholarly Journal Archive) |
none |
|
African Abstracts/Bulletin Analytique
Africaniste |
Arranged by region; citations appear under
subject "West Africa-Ghana" |
|
Quality
of Indexing
MLA International Bibliography uses very
broad terms for its subject control of the articles indexed from Research
Review. The subject heading "Africa" appears as one subject
heading for all thirty-six items indexed. Shujaa defines this as a
problem of not having culturally relevant subject access (Shujaa, 2001,
A Progress Report: Online Dissemination & Preservation of the Research
Review). An example of the lack of culturally relevant subject
access is the citation "Agofi, Kofi Ermeleh, The Aesthetics of Creative
Communication in African Performance Situations Research Review
(Ghana). 4(1): 1-9. 1988"– the subject access provided through MLA
International Bibliography is three subject headings established
in the thesaurus: folk rituals; folk drama; Africa. "Africa" pulls up
6316 citations; "Folk Rituals" pulls up 10,487 citations; "Folk Drama"
pulls up 1526 citations. Combining the three subject headings results
in 131 citations– certainly less daunting to sort through, but the lack
of depth in indexing obscures this particular citation. "African
performance" as a keyword search results in 6 citations of which
Agofi's article is one. Certainly keyword searching is powerful tool,
but it cannot always be relied upon as the only way to retrieve
information. With keyword searching there is the problem of false
drops, variant spellings, and eliminating materials by language, for
you are only searching in the language of the keyword used. In the case
of articles in Research Review, performing searches in MLA
International Bibliography by both thesaurus terms and keyword
will only result in citations published in 1966-73, and 1988. Research
Review suffers from a lack of breadth, depth and continual
coverage of its language and literature research by this particular
index.
Name authority also presents a problem. In the
publication Research Review, the above author is given as
K.E. Agovi, and not Agofi as MLA International Bibliography
lists. This may be a simple typographical error or a problem of
establishment in name authority in MLA International Bibliography.
Citing African authors
publishing in indigenous African journals: Social Sciences
Citation Index Example
Because Research Review is not
adequately indexed in the North American and Western European
bibliographic tools, it is no surprise that authors publishing works in
Research Review generally do not have these
works cited. A cited reference selection search in Social Sciences
Citation Index (SSCI) returned 80 references for Research
Review. Compare the results for an American or European journal
such as Africa where the results are more matches than the SSCI
system can handle.
A search of authors published in volume 3, number
2, 1967 Research Review, and the New Series volume 1, number
2, July 1985 and volume 6 number 1, 1990 in SSCI reveals the
following:
K.N. (Kwabena N.) Bame, an author appearing in the
1967, volume 3 Research Review appears as a cited author 14
times, or 14 hits, in the SSCI. Bame's works, such as books
(either published in North America, Europe or Africa) and articles
published in non-African journals, are represented. Only one article
from Research Review is pulled up. Eboe Hutchful, a
Nigerian scholar, cited a volume 7 Research Review article by
K.N. Bame in: "The development of the army officer corps in Ghana,
1956-1966," Journal of African Studies, 2 (3): 163-173 Fall,
1985 (Hutchful, E., University of Port Harcourt, School of Social
Sciences, Port Harcourt, Nigeria). On the other hand, Bame's works have
a better chance of being cited if they appeared in a non-African
published journal.
Five authors, Agovi, Arhin, Baku, Awedoba, and
Asimeng, all appearing in the 1990 volume 6, number 1 New Series were
checked in SSCI. For Agovi, no articles by him were found
(spelled either Agovi or Agofi), but four hits were pulled up for five
articles that cited his work. Arhin had ten articles as an author, and
20 hits as cited references and all in non-African journals. Baku had
no articles in SSCI as an author and no hits as a cited
author. Awedoba had five articles as an author, and three hits as cited
references, two of which are theses (Ghana and Oxford). Asimeng had no
citations as an author or as being cited. Seven authors, Addo-Fening;
Arhin; M. Olaseboye Olasehinde; Wyllie, Sackey, Dakubu and Awedoba, in
the volume 1, number 2, July 1985 issue were also checked. Arhin and
Awedoba overlap so the five remaining authors were checked. Addo-Fening
had no hits as an author or cited author. Olasehinde had one article
listed and no hits as a cited author. Wyllie has ten articles listed as
author and twelve hits as a cited author. Sackey has no articles as an
author or hits as a cited author. Dakubu has three articles as author
and ten as a cited author, but these appear in non-African
publications. Other studies have noted the phenomenon that to be
recognized, the best chance for a scholar's research to be cited is to
place it in a North American or European publication. This marginalizes
the indigenous African publication (Silver, 2002; Rosenberg, 2002).
Lack of preservation of
originals for long term access
Volumes of the New Series were made available for
my use. The issues published in the 1990s have a glossy white cover,
pages are stapled in, and the paper used is of a quality that has not
resulted in yellowing and breakage. The quality of paper suggests that
these volumes will hold up well. The efforts to digitize the more
recent issues of Research Review will also provide additional
access. Unfortunately, the issues published in the 1980s are not in as
fine a condition. The covers are of card stock in light blue, or yellow
that is brittle. There is foxing and breakage of the covers and the
bound pages. The July 1985 issue's paper is brown with age; in some
cases the printing has faded and is very difficult to read. Care of the
original paper copies needs to be a priority. Although digitalization
is one solution, it should not be the only solution. The original paper
copies need preservation to represent the uniqueness of the journal and
its historical development and significance to modern African research
dissemination. Nicholson Baker (2001) makes a strong case for the need
to protect originals as well as making surrogates (whether by
microfilming or digitizing) as the hallmark of preserving cultural
heritage. Baker's concern has particular resonance for African
publications.
"Although the creation of
specialized indexes by self-interested parties is necessary and
laudable, it is recommended that along with the specialized efforts...
American indexing services take on indigenous journals..."
Conclusions
and Recommendations
Indexing, Abstracting, Relevant
Thesauri: It is not enough to say that an item is indexed
and/or abstracted. Depth of indexing, availability of the abstracts,
cultural relevancy, and continuity are also elements that need to be
measured and advocated. The availability of the bibliographic tools
needs to be greater and more user friendly. For example, African
Abstracts/Bulletin Analytique Africaniste is a specialized source
that is best used by sophisticated bibliography researchers. There is
no "in-between" source for researchers who lack the searching
sophistication of subject specialists. Greater dissemination of the
rich content in Research Review would be improved if a
variety of indexing and abstracting commercial services would include
the journal in their universe of international journals indexed and/or
abstracted. For example, many American journals are indexed and
abstracted by a variety of bibliographic tools arranged to meet the
needs of a diverse level of audiences. There is no reason that this
could not be done with selected African journals, particularly the Research
Review. Perhaps it is lack of knowledge regarding the existence of
such an indigenous African journal, or a bias that the journal is
lacking in quality because it is an indigenous African journal, that
precludes this particular journal from being indexed and abstracted by SSCI
and AHCI and other indexing and abstracting services. It must
be acknowledged that the American general magazine index, H.W. Wilson's
Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature did
not index black American owned and published magazines such as Ebony,
Jet, Essence, Black
Enterprise, etc. until pressure was placed upon the H.W. Wilson
publishing company in the late 1960s by black and white librarians to
do so. Previous to this time, Black American librarians created
specialized indexes to the periodicals, magazines and newspapers by and
about blacks that white American indexes ignored. Both black and white
librarians placed pressure on mainstream indexes to be more inclusive
of the diverse American voices, and what the mainstream did not index,
maverick librarians created tools such as Alternative Press Index in
1969 to fulfill this need. This index continues to provide access to
over 400 non-mainstream publications on a wide variety of topics
related to cultural, economic, political and social change. There
should be little surprise then, that less than 40 years later of
broadening access to enrich the research and writings of minorities and
the marginalized of the United States, that the international arena
regarding equitable access to developing nations' research and
scholarship continues to lag. Although the creation of specialized
indexes by self-interested parties is necessary and laudable, it is
recommended that along with the specialized efforts, more mainstream,
American indexing services take on indigenous journals, and especially
the title in this case study, Research Review.
Library holdings:
Diminished library budgets for acquisition of materials, especially
serials, presents a challenge for increasing North American and
European library holdings. Forty-eight libraries were identified as
owning Research Review, a number which surprised the general
editor Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu as being far greater than expected. The
ability to acquire Research Review does not seem to be
problematic for North American and European libraries. Are developing
nations, especially those on the continent of Africa, able to purchase
and catalog this title for their collections? A recommendation
regarding library holdings would be to increase the dialogue between
developed and developing nations concerning the North American and
European market for African research and scholarship. There is limited
understanding by developing nations of the budget constrictions faced
by libraries in the developed world. It is also recommended that Research
Review find a way to get its paper copies to more African
libraries. Perhaps the expensive digital efforts that are being done in
Europe and America would see a better use of the money by providing
subscriptions to African libraries. It is not recommended that
digitizing efforts for African research and scholarship be halted, for
digitizing materials is an important aspect towards increasing access
(Katundu 2001; Zell 2003). But a percentage of money devoted to
high-technology projects should be earmarked to continue paper
subscriptions still needed by African libraries.
African publishers should also be made aware of
the importance of obtaining ISSNs and being listed in directories such
as Ulrich's. This would increase knowledge about a
publication's availability.
Citing indigenous authors in
indigenous journals: Scholars in developing nations need
incentives for publishing their research in developing nations
journals. The insularity and marginalization that is feared is real.
Indigenous developing nations journals would be strengthened if they
were indexed and abstracted broadly. Cited authors from these journals
are likely to have been cited because of personal knowledge about the
research and/or footnote chasing. If these authors publishing in
indigenous journals were included in American and European indexes, it
would increase dissemination beyond the personal knowledge.
Lack of preservation of originals for
long term access: The rush to digitize and devote
expensive technological solutions to this problem is a short-sighted
solution. If a percentage of grant dollars could be earmarked for ways
to preserve in traditional as well as electronic formats, long term
access could be guaranteed. Research Review needs careful
paper preservation; it needs cataloging by the institutions that have
it but have not provided bibliographic access; it needs to be made
available to institutions where a paper copy, and not a digital copy,
is the most appropriate, resourceful way to provide access. For
developing nations, there is the anxiety of not having the advances of
the developed nations and a fear of being forever behind. But sometimes
it is not appropriate to have the highest technology devoted to
something that inexpensive, workable, low technology can do. Digitizing
the journals is not the only answer, and it is hoped that an emphasis
will be placed on how to best preserve the paper copies, particularly
on the African continent. Diana Rosenberg found that African journals
were important to the research and teaching of 70% of scholars in
Africa (1999); therefore, making African journals accessible in a
variety of ways could break the barriers to the dissemination of
African research and scholarship. The preservation of African research
and scholarship should not be an either/or proposition of digital
versus paper. There is no reason that both cannot be supported and
nurtured.
Barriers to the dissemination of African research
and scholarship are surmountable. Improved indexing, and inclusion of
African published materials by American and European international
bibliographic tools can be accomplished and would help to dissolve this
knowledge barrier.
References
Agada, J. "Towards a Networked Community of
Africans in the Diaspora: Problems and Prospects." In National
Conference of African American Librarians 3rd : 1997:
Winston-Salem,
NC. Culture Keepers III. Black Caucus of the American Library
Association, 363-77. Newark: BCALA, 2000.
Arhin, K. "University of Ghana, 30th Anniversary
Celebration. African Studies: The Vision and the Reality." Research
Review. March 1992.
Baker, Nicholson. Double Fold: Libraries and
the
Assault on Paper. (New York: Random House, 2001).
Cobb, C. "'Digital Divide' Widest in Africa but
Focus on 'Digital Development,' Conference Urged." African News
Service (July 18, 2001): 1008-1116.
Dakubu, M. E. K. Conference call, telephone
conversation. December 12, 2002. Fort Valley, Georgia.
Gibbs, W.W. "Information-Have-Nots." Scientific
American. 273 (May 1995): 12-14.
International Literary Market Place. (New
York: Bowker, 2004). Pp. 304-307; 1149; 1305-06.
Johnston, G. "Memorandum." Master Listing of
Research Review Journals. September 19, 2002.
Katundu, D. R. M. "Preservation Challenges for
Africa's Information Systems: the case of electronic records." Information
Development. 17-3, (September, 2001): 179-183.
Maissen, L. "Ghana International Book Fair." Bookbird
35. (Spring 1997): 42-43.
Rosenberg, D. "African Journals - An Evaluation of
the Use of African-published Journals in African Universities
Evaluating Impact." Education Research Paper. No. 36 (1999):
63. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/africanjournalsedpaper36.pdf.
Shujaa, M. "A Progress Report: Online
Dissemination & Preservation of the Research Review." Unpublished
document (2001).
Stankus, T. "Avoiding a rush to a verdict of
guilty: The treatment of third world science by first world publishers
and librarians." RQ. 35-4 (1996): 467-475.
United Nations. "Book Production - Africa."
Demographic
Year Book.
(1997): 111-116 found at: www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/education/book_production/africa.html.
Yankah, K. "Displaced Academics and the Quest for
a New World Academic Order." Africa Today. (Third Quarter,
1995), 7-25.
Zell, Hans M. "Digital Media and African
Publishing." In: The Book & Computer/Online Symposium.
November 12, 2003. http://www.honco.net/os/index_0310.html.
About
the Author
Lorna Peterson is Associate Professor,
Department of Library and Information Studies, School of Informatics,
University of Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Email: lpeterso [at] buffalo [dot] edu.
© 2002 Lorna Peterson
Top of Page | Table of Contents
|